Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nikolay Nedelchev vs George Goldhoff Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nedelchev vs Goldhoff analysis and find out who is favored!
Nikolay Nedelchev vs George Goldhoff Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nedelchev 0 - 0 Goldhoff
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nedelchev has won 46.7% of points on his second serve, while Goldhoff has won 48.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nedelchev, in recent form, has won 52.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Goldhoff has won 42.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.11% and 30.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nedelchev has saved 58.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goldhoff has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nedelchev has won 61.9% of matches played (W/L 39/ 24), with Goldhoff winning 33.33% (W/L 1/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nedelchev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 89/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Goldhoff has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nedelchev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 39/ 24), where as Goldhoff has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nedelchev has played against opponents with an average rank of 123.73 while Goldhoff has played against players with an average rank of 165.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nedelchev has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goldhoff has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nedelchev has converted 33.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goldhoff has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nedelchev 0 - 0 Goldhoff
894
Rank
890
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
64% (113-63)
Career Total W/L
62% (95-59)
75% (24-8)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nikolay Nedelchev | George Goldhoff |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (24/8) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (51/21) | 43% (3/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (410/285) | 48% (29/32) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (24/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.93 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 1.03 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:16 | 1:24:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 129.91 | 165.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (907/1284) | 47% (91/194) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (582/907) | 76% (69/91) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (185/377) | 49% (50/103) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (59/173) | 46% (6/13) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (611/1411) | 35% (63/179) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (24/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (24/32) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (24/21) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (24/3) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (1/0) |
Nikolay Nedelchev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Antoine Vincent
Player
Nikolay Nedelchev
66%
(
90 of
136)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
43%
(
58 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Jesse Delaney
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Nikolay Nedelchev
43%
(
29 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Liam Delicata
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 5-7 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Nikolay Nedelchev
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 7-6(6) 12-10 | H2H | |||
view more
George Goldhoff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
George Goldhoff
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
17
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Goldhoff
Player
Guillermo Delgadillo
38%
(
15 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
12
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
George Goldhoff
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(5) ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
George Goldhoff
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Goldhoff
Player
Varun Jayaram
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
42%
(
16 of
38)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Evans
Player
George Goldhoff
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Goldhoff
Player
Emile Hudd
50%
(
40 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Nedelchev Vs Goldhoff Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
